Foreign Policy: Iraq

I have not yet blogged on any political hot button topics. This was not because I hadn't had any thoughts concerning politics. I just didn’t want people to think that was the intent of the blog. After Bush's speech address last night I have a few thoughts. Let me make no qualms about it, I support the War on Terror and I voted for George W. Bush. If you can not be open minded enough to expose yourself to a political ideology that differs from yours I suggest you not read this blog.

I support the War on Terror because it is the proactive approach to confront hate driven ideologies that we should have put in place a long time ago. Ever since WWII, the United States seemed to have a policy of prevention. Prevent North Korea from invading South Korea. Attempting to prevent North Vietnam from attacking South Vietnam. In the early 90s it was prevent Iraq from invading Kuwait. Evil, freedom hating, tyrannical dictatorships could exist as long as they only terrorized and killed those who lived within their borders. And why not, if they kept it within their borders it doesn't affect us as Americans right? Wrong.

By allowing them to exist we allowed them to strengthen and on September 11th, 2001 they brought the terror to us and kicked us in the mouth. So what was our reaction? It was to uproot the Taliban government in Afghanistan that protected terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and to go after bin Laden. Our next, and obviously much more controversial step, was to go in the tyrannical terrorist hotbed of Iraq and uproot Saddam Hussein and the terrorists.

Many people claimed the terrorists were in Afghanistan and had nothing to do with Iraq. Let me say this, the terrorist ideology and their network is not limited by a country's border. This is made obvious by the number of insurgents including Zarqawi who is Al-Qaeda. That is the last time I will refer to these men as insurgents; they are terrorists. The bias of the liberal media resulted in defining these men insurgents because calling them terrorists would be to admit that President Bush was right. How can al Qaeda be terrorists when they attack us at home but be insurgents when they attack Americans and innocent people in Iraq?

Anyways, getting back to the timeline. So we send troops to Afghanistan and a little over a year later we decide to go after Iraq. The plan was to defeat the government who creates the most anti-American sentiment, bring those tyrants and terrorists to justice, and to bring democracy and freedom to the Middle East.

There is a lot of talk about how Bush and the U.S. military did not have a plan going into this war. Let me break down some facts for you. First off Iraq is a big country, roughly the size of Texas but with slightly more people and less land size, with conditions that are not ideal for tanks. Second, Baghdad, the biggest city in Iraq and capital, is located dead in the middle of the country. I watched a history channel special that focused on the take over and ranked it one of the best in history in terms of how swift the take over was and how few lives were lost. Here is a quick recap of how quick it truly was…
We launch the attack on March 19.
By April 9th we had secured Baghdad. (20 Days)
April 23rd we arrive in Fallujah which we now know is where a majority of Al-Qaeda fled. (34 Days)
On July 22nd troops kill Saddam's sons in a firefight in Mosul (123 Days)
Thanksgiving, November 27th, President Bush and Condoleeza Rice secretly travel to Baghdad to have dinner with the troops (248 Days)
A little over 2 weeks later and less than 9 months from the initial invasion we capture Saddam Hussein. (262 Days)
President Bush should play the lottery if all that was accomplished without a plan.

At the beginning of the war many people argued we're engaging in this war because of oil. You hardly ever hear this anymore because that argument did not hold water. Oil and gasoline prices have gone up because of the war and we have spent more money than we will make back as a result of discounted energy from a new friendly nation. Two years later it is obvious that this conflict is about much more than dependance on energy from corrupt foreign nations.

The argument that there is not a connection between Iraq and terror SHOULD be settled by now but it isn't. An undeniable fact is that Saddam Hussein and his hatred for freedom and America, if nothing else, was a huge inspiration to these terrorists. I find it awfully ironic that we go to Iraq and what do we find? What has been the number one killer of US and Iraqi troops? Al-Qaeda terrorist groups, namely the one sponsored by Zarqawi who does have connections to bin Laden. But I guess that is all just coincidence and Zarqawi had no connections with Saddam or the American-hating Iraqi government. Hell he was probably just in Iraq on vacation with his family when our troops arrived being the loving man that he is.

I really do not understand why people who opposed the Iraq invasion so thoroughly wanted to give Iraq the benefit of the doubt. I am sure Saddam and his cronies had nothing to do with the terrorists who attacked us, they seem like nice enough guys. I doubt he would ever give any support or weapons to terrorists that they could use against us. I doubt he has any weapons of mass destruction even though there is intelligence that leads future Democratic Presidential nominee John Kerry to believe there are. Saddam's not wanting UN weapons inspectors to be in Iraq has nothing to do with his plans for a WMD program.

Going back to the analogy, imagine looking for a bomb and all you know is it allegedly was built in Texas. It could be anywhere in Texas, it could have been dismantled by now, or it could be transported out of this area but while you are fighting in a war I want you to find this bomb. If you were expecting them to come on the news and say, “They found a WMD factory in a warehouse in the middle of Baghdad with 6 nuclear weapons” then you were mistaken. If there were weapons with a big red button on them they would have been detonated by now.

The military gets very little credit for how efficient they have been. They have been there over two years and in that little amount of time they have accomplished a ton. They ousted Hussein and the government that had been in place for 3 decades which is an underappreciated accomplishment. They have established democracy and held elections in a region that has not had democracy. The progress in Iraq has encouraged Syria, Turkey, and other surrounding nations in the Middle East are moving towards democracy. They uncovered a hornet’s nest of terrorists and have apprehended and taken prisoner a huge chunk of the terrorist network. They have kept the terrorists on the run and as a result the fight is being fought on their soil and at home we have experienced secure stable lives. They managed to accomplish all this in two years and at the expense of only 1,700 Americans Soldiers. Men die in wars; that is an undeniable fact. If your goal is to doing something great then chances are its not going to come easy. But if you break down U.S. wars by what was accomplished and how many lives were lost, Iraq may be one of the most successful operations in our country’s history.

War: Revolutionary War
Accomplishment: Freedom from England
American Lives Lost: 6,824

War: Civil War
Accomplishment: Abolished slavery, prevented the nation from splitting
American Lives Lost: 359,528

War: WWI
Accomplishment: Prevents German takeover of Europe and German alliance with Mexico
American Lives Lost: 126,000

War: WWII
Accomplishment: Ends Holocaust and Nazi take over of Europe
American Lives Lost: 407,000

War: Vietnam War
Accomplishment: Attempted to prevent Communist North Vietnam to take over South Vietnam but failed
American Lives Lost: 58,226

War: Iraq
Accomplishments to date: Ousted Saddam Hussein, established democracy and held elections in the Middle East, captured terrorists
American Lives Lost to date: 1,744

Go find the nearest 7 year old and ask her which number doesn’t fit. I understand there are more consequences that just lost lives. Funding wars are not free but our economy is already coming back around and the deficit that the war has caused has not resulted in such rampant inflation that our lives have been affected. It outrages me when people say that Iraq is the Vietnam of this generation. We have already had 10 times more success in 2 years in Iraq than we had in nearly 20 years in Vietnam and we have not endured anywhere near the sacrifice.

And how ironic that Kofi Annan , Secretary-General of the UN, and Jacques Chirac, France’s President, who were so adamantly opposed to the invasion of Iraq ended up being found to be the main players in the Iraqi Oil-for-Food scandal. What would ousting Saddam Hussein bring to them besides an end to cheap oil and big dollar kickbacks?

Whether or not you agree with the war and support our president’s decisions and the efforts of our soldiers you can sleep easy at night knowing you and the rest of the world is safer.

hj

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: